You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 9 No. 4, October 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Localized Cooling in the Central Nervous System

Part II. Histopathological Results

YUJI MIYAZAKI, MD; FRANK R. ERVIN, MD; JEAN SIEGFRIED, MD; EDWARD P. RICHARDSON, MD; VERNON H. MARK, MD

Arch Neurol. 1963;9(4):392-399.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

The recent progress in clinical stereotactic surgery has largely been the result of detailed human brain atlases, effective procedures for making discrete brain lesions, and improved lightweight accurate stereotactic machines. These advances rely on the correlation of neuroanatomical landmarks with the radiographic ventricular outline. The individual variations in human brains plus the necessity of translating ventriculothalamic measurements obtained from the cadaver to the living patient give less than perfect accuracy in placing a stereotactic lesion within the cerebral target area. This is particularly true when the target area lies in the thalamus of a patient with infantile choreoathetosis, since diffuse brain pathology often distorts the relation of the target area to ventricular landmarks. In this situation, the necessity of using neurophysiological guides is apparent. Stimulation, recording of evoked potentials, and the production of reversible brain lesions have been the three standard physiological guides used by stereotactic surgeons. Our group . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

BOSTON

From the Departments of Psychiatry and Pathology and the Neurosurgical Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Departments of Surgery, Psychiatry, and Pathology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.


Footnotes

Submitted for publication April 26, 1963; accepted June 8.

Present Address: Department of Neurosurgery, Sapporo Medical College and Hospital, S1, W-16, Sapporo, Japan (Dr. Miyazaki).

This work was supported by Grant No. NB-03425 from the National Institutes of Health, a grant from the United Cerebral Palsy Association, and the Hall-Mercer Fund.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.