You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 9 No. 2, August 1963 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Fusimotor Function

Part I. Spinal Shock of the Cat and the Monkey

ROBERT S. HUNT, MD; GERALD E. MELTZER, MD; WILLIAM M. LANDAU, MD

Arch Neurol. 1963;9(2):120-126.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Spinal shock was defined by Franz1 as the "state of depression of spinal reflexes (hyporeflexia), generally transient in character, which occurs after transection in the bodily segments caudal to the lesion." Of several hypotheses,2,3 the most widely accepted is that of Sherrington: "Reflex depression is due to the sudden withdrawal of a continuous excitation (facilitation) which normally occurs from suprasegmental levels."4

Sherrington and Fulton observed that in monkeys spinal shock and the subsequent permanent disability are more severe and much longer lasting than in cats and dogs.5,6 In man it is well known that shock is even more severe and lasts longer than in monkey. Yet neither the intrinsic mechanism of the phenomenon nor its species variations are well understood.

Out of recent knowledge of the fusimotor (gamma efferent) system which functions to regulate the sensitivity of muscle stretch receptors, the idea has developed that the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

ST. LOUIS


Footnotes

Submitted for publication Jan 11, 1963; accepted April 30.

From the Division of Neurology and the Beaumont-May Institute of Neurology, Washington University School of Medicine.

Washington University Medical School Student Research Fellows (Drs. Hunt and Meltzer).

Supported in part by US Public Health Service Grants B-882 and NB-04513.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1963 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.