You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 7 No. 1, July 1962 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (79)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Brainstem Dysfunction with Supratentorial Mass Lesions

DONALD E. McNEALY, M.D.; FRED PLUM, M.D.

Arch Neurol. 1962;7(1):10-32.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

Supratentorial mass lesions may produce neurological dysfunction by 2 mechanisms: Cerebral hemispheric damage from the primary lesion itself and secondary brainstem damage from displacement, tissue compression, swelling, and vascular stasis. Of the 2 processes, the latter often is more immediately threatening to life. Thus, a major factor guiding the choice and timing of treating patients with supratentorial lesions is whether secondary brainstem compression has occurred or is progressing. Previous studies emphasizing late clinical signs and postmortem pathology fail to answer how clinical signs evolve from earliest upper brainstem or third nerve impairment to final medullary collapse.

Seeking this information, we examined serially 52 patients with supratentorial mass lesions and secondary brainstem dysfunction. This paper reports the results: Either of 2 relatively distinct clinical pictures provided the first clear evidence when supratentorial masses were threatening brainstem function. One picture had signs of uncal herniation producing third nerve and lateral midbrain . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

SEATTLE

From the Division of Neurology, University of Washington School of Medicine.


Footnotes

Received for publication Jan. 25, 1962.

Aided by Grant No. B-1597 from the U.S. Public Health Service.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1962 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.