You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 54 No. 4, April 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Traditional Risk Factors for Stroke in the Young

Carmine Marini, MD; Antonio Carolei, MD
Clinica Neurologica Dipartimento di Medicina Interna e Sanità Pubblica Università degli Studi di L'Aquila 67100 L'Aquila-Collemaggio, Italy

Arch Neurol. 1997;54(4):351-352.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

We applaud the efforts of Rohr and coworkers1 who published a further contribution addressing the cause of stroke in young adults with a case-control study.2 The authors make reference only to history of hypertension and diabetes and current cigarette smoking though other modifiable or unmodifiable risk factors, such as diet, obesity, migraine, alcohol abuse, oral contraceptive use, hypercholesterolemia, and hypertriglyceridemia, might have been easily included in their analysis. Their data on history of hypertension and current cigarette smoking are consistent with our odds ratios ranging from 2.7 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.9-8.1) to 3.6 (95% CI, 1.7-7.5) in the different hypertension categories and the 3.4 odds ratio (95% CI, 2.3-5.1) that we found for current smoking.2

Rohr and coworkers1 also found very high odds ratios for diabetes (22.9 in white men and 6.2 in white women, respectively), which were higher than expected. In fact, while the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.