You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 54 No. 10, October 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOK REVIEWS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Headache Treatment Trial Methodology and New Drugs

edited by J. E. S. Olesen, MD, PhD, and Peter Tfelt-Hansen, PhD, 400 pp, $95, Philadelphia, Pa, Lippincott-Raven Publishers, 1997.

Dewey K. Ziegler, MD, Reviewer
Kansas City, Kan

Arch Neurol. 1997;54(10):1199-1200.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This is a volume of 56 chapters, almost all of them quite brief. The first half of the volume relates to the methodological problems in clinical trials of drugs for the treatment of headache. The second half of the volume contains articles concerning effectiveness of sumatriptan, new methods of its administration, and reports of safety and efficacy of a variety of new 5-hydroxytriptamine 1D agonists in the treatment of migraine. The last section of the book is a potpourri of studies of other agents known to be useful, or considered as possibly useful, in the treatment of migraine—salicylates, substance P agonists, and sodium valproate.

There are several excellent aspects to this volume. The initial chapters enlighten the reader on the basics of clinical drug trials—the phases of research in new drugs and the problems of experimental design, such as decisions regarding the use of crossover vs parallel form studies. Several . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.