You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 54 No. 1, January 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Role of Evoked Potentials in Coma-Reply

Christian Madl, MD
Department of Medicine IV Intensive Care Unit University Hospital of Vienna Waehringer Guertel 18-20 A-1090 Vienna, Austria

Edith Eisenhuber, MD; Ludwig Kramer, MD; Georg Grimm, MD, PhD
Vienna

Arch Neurol. 1997;54(1):18.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In reply

The data of Rothstein, reported in his letter, additionally support our results of the predictive ability of sensory evoked potentials in nontraumatic comatose patients. His neuropathological examination of 9 patients with abnormal cortical sensory evoked potentials after hypoxic-ischemic coma gave important information on the extension of cerebral necrosis. This correlation further confirms our conclusion that patients with bilateral absent cortical evoked responses have widespread cortical damage and therefore will never regain the basic quality of life. However, in our opinion, these results do not warrant the conclusion by Rothstein in the first paragraph of his letter that bilateral absence of cortical evoked potentials predicts brain death in all circumstances. Recording of sensory evoked potentials cannot substitute conscientious clinical neurological examination in the diagnosis of brain death.

Rothstein's statement concerning the missing significance in our study of the N13 to N20 interpeak latency between survivors and nonsurvivors is incorrect. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.