You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 12, December 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Subcutaneous Dihydroergotamine vs Subcutaneous Sumatriptan-Reply

Paul K. Winner, DO
Palm Beach Headache Center 5205 Greenwood Ave West Palm Beach, FL 33407

Joel R. Saper, MD
Ann Arbor, Mich

Arch Neurol. 1996;53(12):1215-1216.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In reply

The first double-blind randomized study directly comparing subcutaneous dihydroergotamine with subcutaneous sumatriptan in the treatment of acute migraine1 clearly describes the treatment groups with the main outcome measures of pain relief and recurrence of successfully treated headaches emphasized. The conclusions of this article note that the "onset of relief with sumatriptan was more rapid, but by 3 hours dihydroergotamine and sumatriptan were equally efficacious" and "relief with dihydroergotamine was more sustained." Headache resolution was noted by both graphics and narrative to be 56.6% for the dihydroergotamine group and 78% for the sumatriptan group at 1 hour, and at 2 hours headache relief was 73% and 85%, respectively, which statistically significantly favored the sumatriptan group in the first 2 hours. Our selection of the 2-hour evaluation point in the abstract is consistent with the guidelines for controlled trials of "drugs in migraine"2 that recommends, "Number of migraine . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.