You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 53 No. 1, January 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Anosognosia in Alzheimer's Disease

Alexander P. Auchus, MD; John L. Woodard, PhD; Felicia C. Goldstein, PhD; Joanne Green, PhD; Robert C. Green, MD
Emory Neurobehavioral Program Wesley Woods Center 1841 Clifton Rd NE Atlanta, GA 30329

Arch Neurol. 1996;53(1):10.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

We read with interest the report by Starkstein et al1 in the April 1995 issue of the ARCHIVES. Our group has also studied anosognosia in Alzheimer's disease (AD) and has reported significantly greater visuoconstructive dysfunction in patients with AD and anosognosia compared with patients with AD without anosognosia.2 In our study, we suggested that extensive right-sided cerebral dysfunction underlies this finding. Consequently, we were pleased to see the results of the report by Starkstein et al showing reduced cerebral blood flow in the right cerebral hemisphere of patients with AD and anosognosia.

We do not, however, agree with the conclusion by Starkstein et al that anosognosia in AD does not relate to deficits in specific neurocognitive domains. The statistical approach that they used to study this issue (two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures) is inappropriate. The authors treated "neuropsychological tasks" as a repeated-measures variable. However, data points . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.