You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 52 No. 3, March 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tension-Type Headache: Classification, Mechanisms, and Treatment

edited by Jes Olesen and Jean Schoenen, 315 pp, $95, New York, NY, Raven Press, 1993.

Dewey K. Ziegler, MD, Reviewer
Kansas City, Kan

Arch Neurol. 1995;52(3):235.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Tension-type headache is probably the most frequent presenting complaint to the majority of practicing neurologists, and Drs Olesen and Schoenen are correct in drawing our attention to the startling fact that this volume is the first scientifically based book that focuses exclusively on this problem. The book is a report of the Third International Headache Research Seminar and consists of 48 papers of varying length, some extremely brief, organized into the following six categories: clinical features in epidemiology; experimental studies of myofascial nociception; pathology, pharmacology, and biochemistry; central mechanisms of tension-type headache; peripheral mechanisms of tension-type headache; and therapeutic aspects.

Certainly, all aspects of the tension headache problem are covered in this volume, and in each section there is a discussion summary at the conclusion of the papers on specific topics. The reviews of each subject are in general quite well done, although there is marked variability. The review by . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.