You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 51 No. 8, August 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Effect of Carbamazepine on Serum Lipid Levels-Reply

Jouko I. T. Isojärvi, MD, PhD; Vilho V. Myllylä, MD, PhD
Department of Neurology

Arto J. Pakarinen, MD, PhD
Department of Clinical Chemistry University of Oulu FIN-90220 Oulu Finland

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(8):749.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In reply

We thank Wagner and Preblick for their interest in our study1 regarding serum lipid levels during carbamazepine medication. They present some criticisms on the statistical methods that we used. However, we feel that the statistical analysis with the paired t test was adequate and did not increase the chance of finding significant differences when they were not present.

We have reanalyzed the data with analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures with a post-hoc test (Fisher's LSD test). All differences that were significant with the paired t test remained significant with the new analysis. Actually, serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels after 2 months (P<.001) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels after 12 months (P<.001) differed more significantly from the premedication values with the new analysis than with the paired t test used in the original analysis of the data.1 Therefore, the conclusions presented in our article were . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.