You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 51 No. 8, August 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Therapeutic Claims in Multiple Sclerosis

3rd ed, by William A. Sibley, 212 pp, $13.95, New York, NY, Demos Publications, 1992.

G. C. Ebers, MD, FRCPC, Reviewer
London, Ontario

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(8):746-747.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This useful book is now in its third edition. It has been revised from previous editions by the larger and expanded therapeutic claims committee of the International Federation of Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Societies. This is composed of several well-known MS clinician-investigators, drawn from a worldwide constituency, and the information in this paperback represents their consensus. Although the committee might profit from including a clinical trial methodologist who could provide a non-MS perspective, this volume continues the fine tradition established in the first edition. The historical section, which was such an interesting feature in the first edition, has been abridged, but what is left still provides a sobering perspective on the fads and fancies of the last decades of MS therapy.

The proper design of an MS clinical trial is reemphasized with the appropriate stress placed on, for example, blinding and randomizations. These serve as a good background for the evaluation . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.