You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 51 No. 7, July 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Book Reviews
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Treatment of Multiple Sclerosis: Trial Design, Results, and Future Perspectives

edited by R. A. Rudick and D. E. Goodkin, 313 pp, with illus, New York, NY, Springer-Verlag NY Inc, 1992.

Robert Herndon, MD, Reviewer
Portland, Ore

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(7):643.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This compact multiauthored volume provides essential information for anyone who is, or plans to become, involved in clinical trials in multiple sclerosis. In addition, it provides vital information for any neurologist interested in evaluating therapeutic claims for new therapies.

The historical perspective provided by George Ellison is clear, concise, and informative. The chapter on natural history by Dr Goodkin is outstanding, as is the chapter on assessment of outcome by Drs. D. Paty, E. Willoughby, and J. Whitaker.

While the chapter on design and statistical issues is well written, clearly states the requirements for planning studies, and discusses the major statistical issues, this reviewer disagrees strongly with one of their conclusions, namely that "admission to the trial should be restricted to those patients whose Kurtzke Extended Disability Status Scale (EDSS) is 3.5 or less." This conclusion is justified if one accepts the EDSS as the only or principal basis for . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.