This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Paul H. Blackman, PhD
National Rifle Association of America 1600 Rhode Island Ave NW Washington, DC 20036

Arch Neurol. 1994;51(5):450.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

I was stunned by Menken's response¹ to two letters^2,3 using scientific research to criticize his antigun editorial.⁴ The response amounted to a footnoted name-calling, combined with a sneering suggestion that the "dictates of common sense and everyday experience" are more valuable than "empirical evidence" and that scientific research that reaches conclusions contrary to intuitive assumptions are "so preposterous that only an educated person can believe them."

As it happens, it violates common sense to believe that polio and influenza can be prevented by injecting polio and influenza into a person, and that a broken leg can occasionally be mended by breaking the leg. To ordinary gun owners, it violates common sense to suggest that high levels of gun ownership are the problem when gun ownership is highest among middle-aged non-Hispanic whites living in suburbs, small cities, and rural areas, whereas the high and increasing levels of gun-related . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?