This Article  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Vladimir Hachinski, MD, DSc(Med)

Arch Neurol. 1993;50(8):871.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The capacity for violence may be innate, but its expression is not. Pincus stresses the role of biological factors in determining aggressive behavior. He argues convincingly that cognitive impairment, lapses of awareness in memory, and psychotic symptomatology occur more commonly among violent than nonviolent criminals when compared with the population at large. Restak concurs, but points out that most crimes are committed by individuals with no evidence of brain damage. Moreover, Pincus acknowledges that the majority of brain-damaged and paranoid individuals are not violent.

On the other hand, both Pincus and Restak agree that brain damage can decrease the threshold for impulsive behavior and for violence, providing mitigating considerations for some crimes.

Brain damage may unleash violence, but it does not explain it. Most criminals are neurologically normal. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?