You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 7, July 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

What Treatment for the Guillain-Barré Syndrome?

H. Richard McFarland, MD
Suite 620 4320 Wornall Rd Kansas City, MO 64111

Arch Neurol. 1993;50(7):687.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The Landry-Guillain-Barré-Strohl syndrome (GBS) or acute demyelinating polyradiculopathy varies from a mild form of symmetrical weakness and areflexia to a fulminate ascending paralysis with cranial nerve involvement and respiratory failure.1,2 Likewise, treatment may consist of observation to hospitalization with respiratory assistance. Prior to 1950, bronchopneumonia and/or sepsis was the most common cause of death, now it is effectively managed with modern antibiotics. Currently, the majority of preventable deaths result from failure to provide respiratory support and complications relative to tracheostomy or intubation.3 Autonomic nervous system dysfunction with cardiac arrhythmia is another potentially fatal complication that seems to be more frequent now that steroids are in disfavor. While steroids may be effective for chronic and recurrent forms of GBS, and when given in appropriate dosages over a limited period of time may benefit some patients with acute GBS, the majority of recent treatment trials have failed . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.