You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 7, July 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOKS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Outcome Following Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Edited by Joseph M. Piepmeier, MD, 205 pp, $42, Mount Kisco, NY, Futura Publishing Co Inc, 1992.

Alan I. Faden, MD, Reviewer
Washington, DC

Arch Neurol. 1993;50(7):686.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

As delineated by Piepmeier in his introduction to this volume, results of the second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study (NASCIS II) have irrevocably altered conceptions about clinical spinal cord injury and its- management. That study reinforced the concept of delayed or secondary spinal cord injury now well established in the experimental literature and demonstrated that early treatment (with high-dose corticosteroids) can significantly improve long-term neurologic outcome.

The stated purpose of this book is to "provide an assessment of the successes and failures of current methods." With some exceptions (vide infra), this book does provide a reasonably updated review of many issues related to clinical spinal cord injury. As expected in an edited volume of this type, there is a certain amount of duplication (eg, chapters 5 and 6) and occasional contradictions. Unfortunately, some areas are not covered, such as epidemiology or neurophysiologic assessment. Other issues are inadequately discussed, such . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.