You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 6, June 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOKS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Understanding Brain Damage: A Primer of Neuropsychological Evaluation

2nd ed, by Kevin W. Walsh, 290 pp, with illus, $59, New York, NY, Churchill Livingstone Inc, 1991.

Merrill Hiscock, PhD, Reviewer
Houston, Tex

Arch Neurol. 1993;50(6):565.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The remarkable growth of neuropsychology during the past two decades can be gauged by the proliferation of monographs and textbooks devoted to various facets of the specialty. None of these books serves every purpose, and Walsh's "primer" is no exception. Indeed, this updated version of a 1985 publication occupies a distinct position on the neuropsychological landscape because its scope is deliberately restricted and also because it provides the kind of unified coverage that is difficult to achieve in a multiauthored book. Intended for students of clinical neuropsychology, the book also is meant to serve as a concise introduction to the specialty for generalist clinical psychologists who must deal with common neuropsychological problems in their practice.

Advocacy of a problem-oriented approach to neuropsychological evaluation is hardly unique, but Walsh is probably correct in asserting that this approach has been underrepresented in the literature compared with actuarial approaches such as the Halstead-Reitan . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.