You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 50 No. 12, December 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

On Stuttering and Global Ischemia

Peter T. Fox, MD; Jack L. Lancaster, PhD
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio Research Imaging Center 7703 Floyd Curl Dr San Antonio, TX 78284-6240

Roger J. Ingham, PhD
Department of Speech and Hearing Sciences University of California, Santa Barbara Snidecor Hall Santa Barbara, CA 93106

Arch Neurol. 1993;50(12):1287-1288.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Pool et al1 recently reported on regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) data from single-photon emission computed tomography conducted with 20 adult stutterers and 78 age-matched control subjects. From their analyses of rCBF values in 20 regions of interest (ROIs), using one tomographic section per subject, these researchers concluded that they had obtained "preliminary evidence for cortical dysfunction in stutterers related to reduced and asymmetric left frontal and temporal perfusion." These are very provocative findings with respect to the diagnosis and, perhaps, treatment of this disorder; they have already prompted one derivative investigation2 and an inquiry about the researchers' methodology.3 We also have some inquiries; they concern interpretation and validity of the findings of Pool and colleagues. We believe that their response might also help clarify the importance of their findings.

By far, the most significant finding of the study by Pool et al is that brain blood . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.