You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 5, May 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Hyperintensities in Alzheimer's Disease

Franz Fazekas, MD; Reinhold Schmidt, MD; Hans Offenbacher, MD
Department of Neurology Karl-Franzens University 8036 Graz, Austria

John B. Chawluk, MD
Good Samaritan Hospital Pottsville, PA 17901

Abass Alavi, MD
Department of Radiology Section of Nuclear Medicine University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA 19104

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(5):468-469.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—In an imaging study of Alzheimer's disease and normal aging, Leys et al,1 using our rating scale,2 found no difference in magnetic resonance imaging white matter hyperintensities between the two groups, and only a trend toward increased periventricular hyperintensity in patients with Alzheimer's disease. This is in contrast to our initial observation of a hyperintense "halo" in six of 12 cases of Alzheimer's disease.2 We would like to emphasize, however, that a part of us (F.F., R.S., H.O.) could not replicate this finding in a subsequent study performed under similar conditions. There still remains a trend toward more signal abnormalities in Alzheimer's disease, however. The Table summarizes the current data from subjects without cerebrovascular risk factors in this ongoing project.3

A disproportionately higher number of patients with more marked ventricular enlargement in our first study appears to be the likeliest explanation for these . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.