This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

P. Murali Doraiswamy, MD; Sunjay A. Shah; Mustafa M. Husain, MD; P. Rodrigo Escalona, MD; William M. McDonald, MD; Gary S. Figiel, MD; K. Ranga R. Krishnan, MD
Duke University Medical Center Campus Box 3215 Durham, NC 27710

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(4):360.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—We commend the investigation by Huber et al¹ of midbrain pars compacta size in Parkinson's disease (PD) using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The authors have stimulated interest in an important area of new research, namely the use of MRI to correlate anatomic finding in vivo with clinical disease. Their detailed attention to the MRI methodology adds credence to their findings. However, methodological issues related to the composition and selection of the control group need to be considered carefully and the design of the present study illustrates some of the difficulties frequently encountered.

The authors have not reported the range and mean (±SD) age for the mild and moderate/severe PD groups as well as the standard deviation for age in the control and PD groups. We are concerned that the group of mild PD patients may have been significantly younger than the control subjects. Age may have . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?