You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 3, March 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (14)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Familial Progressive Vestibulocochlear Dysfunction

W. I. M. Verhagen, MD, PhD
Department of Neurology Canisius-Wilhelmina Hospital PO Box 9015 6500 GS Nijmegen, the Netherlands

P. L. M. HUYGEN, PhD
Department of Otolaryngology Academic Hospital PO Box 9101 6500 HB Nijmegen, the Netherlands

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(3):262.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—In 1988, we described a family with vestibular areflexia and progressive hearing loss, presumably developing from the age of about 40 years onward, and caused by an autosomal dominant disorder.1 Among the family members examined in 1984, we found two affected members: the proband, aged 45 years (IV 9 on pedigree1), and his father, aged 71 years (III 16 on pedigree). All other family members examined were reported to show no abnormalities. This also concerned the then 42-year-old sister of the proband (IV 10 on pedigree1). However, her reexamination in 1989, when she was 47 years old, showed that she had also developed the disorder over the past 5 years, and revision of her examinations in 1984 made it clear that a more appropriate interpretation would have been that there were some indications of an impending dysfunction.

In 1989, she returned to our department . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.