You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 12, December 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  EDITORIAL
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (30)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Role of Secondary Epileptogenesis in Human Epilepsy

Frank Morrell, MD

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(12):1221-1224.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Approximately one third of patients with focal epilepsy exhibit bilateral, mainly homotopic, apparently independent, epileptiform electroencephalographic (EEG) abnormalities in scalp-recorded tracings under normal physiologic recording conditions.1-4 Although this finding is well established, its significance with respect to pathophysiology is unclear. For example, does it mean that both hemispheres contain an epileptogenic lesion that is at least potentially clinically significant? Do these bilateral discharges imply that there are multiple primary foci and, if so, why are they so often symmetrical? Or, is it possible that one epileptogenic lesion may give rise to another? Equally obscure is the meaning of such bilateral epileptiform discharge with respect to the outcome of surgical treatment. Does the presence of an active spike focus contralateral to an intended excision afford a warning that the operative intervention is unlikely to result in cure? Is it rather a warning that operative intervention is needed more quickly? Or, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Chicago, Ill

From the Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush Medical College, Chicago, Ill.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication August 19, 1991.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurological Sciences, Rush Medical College, 1653 W. Congress Pkwy, Chicago, IL 60612 (Dr Morrell).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.