You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 48 No. 11, November 1991 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Concerning the Distribution of Cerebral Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptors in Alzheimer's Disease

Barry Zeeberg
The George Washington University Medical Center Walter G. Ross Hall 2300 Eye St NW Washington, DC 20037

Arch Neurol. 1991;48(11):1117-1118.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—A recent article by Weinberger et al1 describes the distribution of cerebral muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChR) in vivo in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) using single photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) imaging of the distribution of radioiodinated 3-quinuclidinyl-4-iodobenzilate ((R,R)-[123I]IQNB), a specific radioligand for the mAChR.2 The primary observation is that there is "... a significant reduction bilaterally in the posterior temporal cortex of the patients with Alzheimer's disease compared with controls..." The authors conclude, "... It is likely that the images reflect the distribution of the relative density of a subpopulation of muscarinic receptors. The majority of the patients with primary degenerative dementia had qualitatively abnormal IQNB SPECT scans, perhaps because of focal areas of reduced receptor density..." However, although it is possible that the (R,R)-[123I]IQNB localization deficits reflect a mAChR deficit, as we show below, the argument presented to distinguish this possibility . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1991 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.