You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 47 No. 10, October 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CONTROVERSIES IN NEUROLOGY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (9)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Low-Grade Gliomas: To Treat or Not to Treat?

A Reply

J. Gregory Cairncross, MD; Normand J. Laperriere, MD

Arch Neurol. 1990;47(10):1139-1140.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

We thank Dr Shaw for his reply to our "controversial consensus."1 He cautions that diffuse (ie, nonpilocytic) low-grade glioma of the cerebral hemispheres is a serious progressive illness, indolent compared with glioblastoma multiforme, but hardly trivial. Backed by data from the Mayo Clinic and elsewhere, he argues that early accurate diagnosis followed by careful limited-field radiotherapy is the best treatment for these tumors. He acknowledges the potential for delayed toxicity due to treatment but states that the side effects of modern radiotherapy are overemphasized. He concludes that radiotherapy is unquestionably of benefit and identifies radiation dose as the critical issue in the modern treatment of low-grade glioma of the cerebral hemispheres.

Shaw et al2 have demonstrated in a careful retrospective analysis that postoperative radiotherapy significantly prolongs the survival of patients with supratentorial low-grade nonpilocytic astrocytoma (including oligoastrocytoma). Patients were ascertained by reviewing the Tissue Registry at the Mayo Clinic. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Clinical Neurological Sciences and Oncology, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada, and London Regional Cancer Centre (Dr Cairncross); and the Department of Radiology, University of Toronto, and Department of Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Hospital, Toronto, Canada (Dr Laperriere).


Footnotes

Accepted for publication February 28, 1990.

Reprint requests to London Regional Cancer Centre, 790 Commissioners Rd E, London, Ontario, Canada N6A 4L6 (Dr Cairncross).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.