You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 47 No. 1, January 1990 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Unilateral Brain-Stem-Reply

Omkar N. Markand, MD, FRCPC; Martin R. Farlow, MD; James C. Stevens, MD; Mary K. Edwards, MD
Department of Neurology 701 Barnhill Dr Indianapolis, IN 46202-5200

Arch Neurol. 1990;47(1):11.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply

—We appreciate the comment made by Dr Anderson. Our studies showed that unilateral pontine lesions commonly produce brain-stem auditory-evoked potential abnormalities only on ipsilateral ear stimulation, whereas unilateral midbrain lesions resulted in brain-stem auditory-evoked potential abnormalities (especially waves IV/V complex) both with ipsilateral and contralateral ear stimulation; the abnormality was invariably more severe with ipsilateral ear stimulation. These findings suggest that the auditory pathways are functionally ipsilateral in the caudal brain-stem, whereas, more rostrally, both ipsilateral and contralateral structures contribute to brain-stem auditory-evoked potential waves IV/V. There is no doubt that the auditory system finally becomes functional contralaterally at a more rostral level of neuraxis, but the exact level at which the contralateral pathways assume dominance is not well established, although some studies suggest this to be at or above the level of inferior colliculus.1 Another complicating fact is that the generators of wave IV/V are not . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1990 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.