You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 9, September 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  BOOKS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ocular Differential Diagnosis

4th ed, by Frederick Hampton Roy, 710 pp, with illus, $49.50, Philadelphia, Pa: Lea & Febiger; 1989.

David N. Smith, MD, Reviewer
Rochester, NY

Arch Neurol. 1989;46(9):942.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This is the fourth revision of a reference well known to the ophthalmic community. Ocular Differential Diagnosis is an exhaustive collection of differential-diagnoses that encompasses the full spectrum of ophthalmic and neuro-ophthalmic disease. It is organized chiefly by regional anatomy, ie, orbit, extra-ocular muscles, pupil, and retina. For example, fourth-nerve palsy is followed by a list of 50 possible causes, a 12-part reference list, and a "diagnostic decision table" that ranks the likelihood of a particular cause against the specific findings of history, examination, and laboratory data. A smaller section describes the differential diagnosis of general visual signs or symptoms. A comprehensive index provides another means of finding your way through this edition.

The fourth edition of Ocular Differential Diagnosis is a further improvement of an already comprehensive and widely used reference. The beginner would better obtain his overview of ocular differential diagnosis from a simpler text, but, for the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.