This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Edward P. Feher, PhD; Roderick K. Mahurin, PhD; Steven B. Inbody, MD; Francis J. Pirozzolo, PhD
Department of Neurology Baylor College of Medicine Texas Medical Center Houston, TX 77030

Arch Neurol. 1989;46(8):843-844.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Benson et al¹ in the July 1988 issue of the ARCHIVES propose the existence of "posterior cortical atrophy" on the basis of case descriptions of five patients. They argue the following: "These cases are sufficiently similar to each other and... sufficiently different from those typical for either Alzheimer's or Pick's disease to warrant classing them separately until definitive pathologic information becomes available." We believe that, although the construct seems attractive and the radiologic evidence supportive, the data presented do not justify the proposal of a new clinical entity.

The authors base their argument on the following major observations: (1) presence of prominent visual deficits and (2) relative preservation of memory, insight, and judgment. The visual deficits in their patients included ocular dysmetria, sticky fixation, simultanagnosia, and visual agnosia. Such deficits, plus others (dyschromatopsia, abnormal visual evoked potentials, prosopagnosia, and loss of contrast sensitivity) have been well-documented . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?