You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 6, June 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Semantic Confusion Surrounding 'Brain Death'-Reply

Madeleine Marie Grigg-Damberger, MD; Gastone G. Celesia, MD; Michael A. Kelly, MD
Department of Neurology Loyola University of Chicago Stritch School of Medicine Maywood, IL 60153

Arch Neurol. 1989;46(6):604.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

—We were encouraged by the discussion created by our article1 on electroencephalographic (EEG) activity following brain death. Drs Lang, Ellis, Belsh, De Giorgio, and Shewmon expressed some concern regarding our methodology. All patients in our study had identifiable irreversible primary damage to their central nervous system as the cause of their clinical state. Drug intoxication, including the single case of acetaminophen poisoning, which resulted in respiratory arrest and hypothermia, had been excluded.

Formal apnea testing was documented in the charts of 36 (64% ) of 56 patients. Formal apnea testing consisted of preoxygenation with 100% oxygen for 10 minutes, then disconnection from the respirator for a period of 10 minutes, while 6 to 10 L/min of oxygen was administered via an intratracheal catheter. Arterial blood gas studies were performed to confirm that a Paco2 value of greater than 60 mm Hg had been reached. Eight of these patients had disconnection . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.