You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 46 No. 11, November 1989 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Tangles of Ependyma-Choroid Plexus Contain β-Amyloid Protein Epitopes and Represent a New Form of Amyloid Fiber

John Moossy, MD
Division of Neuropathology University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine Pittsburgh, PA 15261

Arch Neurol. 1989;46(11):1165.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—In a letter to the editor in this journal, Wen and colleagues state "This is the first demonstration that [Biondi ring tangles] contain a β-amyloid protein that forms fibers that are morphologically different from those of neuritic (senile) plaque and congophilic angiopathy amyloid."1

If we put aside the question of the propriety of four investigators publishing a scientific observation in a letter to the editor rather than in a peer-reviewed article, we should be interested only in the fact that the authors made such an observation, not necessarily that it was the "first" observation. These comments are not intended to minimize, or even to judge, the potential importance of the contribution of these authors. However, they, like many other authors in the biomedical literature, have succumbed to the temptation to claim pioneer status. Many assertions of priority in the scientific literature are often arcane, if not trivial . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1989 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.