You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 45 No. 3, March 1988 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy-Reply

Robert J. Schwartzman, MD; Toni L. McLellan, MD
Department of Neurology Jefferson Medical College 1025 Walnut St, Room 511 Philadelphia, PA 19107

Arch Neurol. 1988;45(3):244.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

—In response to the comment of Dr Levine that "thermography is the best diagnostic instrument beyond the physical examination" in the evaluation of reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD).

Unfortunately, in our experience of over 300 patients treated at the Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Clinic at Jefferson Medical College of Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, we have found that thermography adds nothing beyond the history and physical examination. The diagnosis is selfevident in stage II and stage III patients, whereas in stage I patients, there may be a dissociation between mottling, cyanosis, swelling, burning pain, hyperpathia, and temperature change of the affected part.

The comments of Mr Fogelsong in regard to the essential features of RSD are correct for stage I of the illness. However, a great majority of patients will demonstrate sympathetic overactivity at some point in their illness.

We have reviewed the hypothesis set forth by Roberts1 in 1986, to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1988 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.