You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 43 No. 8, August 1986 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  CONTROVERSIES IN NEUROLOGY
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (32)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Office Tensilon Test for Ocular Myasthenia Gravis

Robert B. Daroff, MD

Arch Neurol. 1986;43(8):843-844.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The technique for intravenous administration of Tensilon (edrophonium chloride) varies. In 1952, Osserman and Genkins1 introduced the test and recommended a 2-mg initial dose followed, if no reaction (usually cholinergic) occurred in 45 s, by the rapid administration of an additional 8 mg. Others have modified the test by waiting five minutes after the initial dose,2 by injecting Tensilon in small increments after the initial dose,2-6 or by slowly infusing the remaining 8 mg.5 Although I have recently been converted by Norman Schatz, MD, to the small-increment method, the significant controversy this essay should address is not drug administration but rather the test end point. What constitutes a "positive" Tensilon response in the physician's office where (without benefit of oculographic equipment7-10) the first Tensilon test is performed in a suspected myasthenic? Such a determination is obviously important since a positive test is virtually diagnostic of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Neurology, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, and University Hospitals of Cleveland, and the Neurology Service, Cleveland Veterans Administration Medical Center.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication March 10, 1986.

Reprint requests to Department of Neurology, University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, OH 44106 (Dr Daroff).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1986 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.