You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 42 No. 5, May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Subcortical Neglect: Intentional or Attentional?

Fausto Viader, MD; Jean Cambier, MD; Maurice Masson, MD; Jean-Pierre Decroix, MD
Clinique Neurologique Hôpital Beaujon 100 bd du Général Leclerc 92110 Clichy, France

Arch Neurol. 1985;42(5):423-424.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—We read with interest the report by Ferro and Kertesz1 concerning a posterior internal capsule infarction associated with neglect. Their case is very similar to two of four cases of the anterior choroidal artery syndrome reported by three of us (cases 1 and 2).2,3 Both of these patients had a complete left hemiple

Outcome in unoperated patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (solid line), compared with hypothetical results of surgery where combined stroke and death rates are 3% or 15%. gia, anesthesia, and homonymous hemianopia following a right posterior capsular infarction. However, their left hemispatial neglect syndrome was of the attentional rather than of the intentional type. Spontaneous drawings were always better than copy, where the left half of models was omitted. Likewise, left neglect appeared in picture description, but the patients correctly placed cities on a map. Neglect was especially important in reading, since the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.