You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 42 No. 5, May 1985 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  LETTERS TO THE EDITOR
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Carotid Bruit Controversy

Brian R. Chambers, MD; John W. Norris, MD
Sunnybrook Medical Center University of Toronto 2075 Bayview Ave Toronto, Ontario, Canada M4N 3M5

Arch Neurol. 1985;42(5):423.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The commentaries by Drs Yatsu and Fields and by Drs Quiñones-Baldrich and Moore on the management of asymptomatic patients with carotid bruits and carotid stenosis provide two extreme perspectives.

Drs Yatsu and Fields believe discovery of an asymptomatic neck bruit does not justify investigation since the risk of thromboembolic stroke is low. Drs Quiñones-Baldrich and Moore maintain that prophylactic endarterectomy is indicated for lesions of greater than or equal to 70% stenosis, assuming the patient is healthy, and that surgical morbidity and mortality is less than 3%.

Our calculations indicate that surgery should be contemplated only for patients with a stroke risk of at least 5% per year.1 Assuming a mortality from causes other than stroke of 4% per year, a perioperative stroke or death rate of 3%, and a stroke risk reduction of two thirds (after uncomplicated surgery), the "break-even point" (after which a beneficial . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1985 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.