You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | RSS | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 40 No. 6, June 1983 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Online Only
 •  Online First Table of
Contents
  Letters to the Editor
 •Online Features
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Delicious Add to Digg Add to Facebook Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Syringobulbia Without Syringomyelia

Paul Gennaro, MD; Marilyn Miller, MD
Veterans Administration Medical Center (127) East Orange, NJ 07019

Arch Neurol. 1983;40(6):394.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—It has been reported that syringobulbia rarely, if ever, occurs in the absence of syringomyelia.1,2 Using high-resolution computed tomographic (CT) scans, we recently examined a man with a gradually progressive spastic quadriparesis and segmental bulbar signs who we believe had this rarely reported condition.

Report of a Case.

—A 59-year-old man had had gradually progressive spastic quadriparesis for 20 years and urinary incontinence for 15 years. There was no personal or family history of headache, neck pain, optic neuritis, diplopia, dysphagia, or dysarthria. On examination, he was alert and oriented, with normal higher intellectual functions. Funduscopic findings and visual fields were normal. The right pupil was 5 mm in diameter, the left pupil was 4 mm in diameter, and both were briskly reactive to light. There was no ptosis. The extraocular movements were normal, as was facial sensation. The right nasolabial fold was very slightly . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Delicious Delicious   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Facebook Facebook   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1983 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.