You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 4 No. 4, April 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (1)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Intracerebral Hemorrhagic Cyst Versus Porencephaly

Report of a Case

MATTHEW T. MOORE, M.D.; DAVID N. RATNAVALE, M.D.

Arch Neurol. 1961;4(4):384-390.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Introduction

Diagnostic problems relating to intracranial space-occupying lesions occasionally lead to an impassé as to the definitive nature of the lesion and consequently the course of action to be taken. This quandary is enhanced in the case of cystic lesions because of their origins and peculiar intracerebral behavior.

The case of intracerebral hemorrhagic cyst, to be reported here, and the discussion are submitted for consideration of the differential diagnosis between intracerebral hemorrhagic cyst and porencephaly, and to help clarify the nature and course of hemorrhagic cysts within the intracerebral environment. Various diagnoses had been made in the patient concerned, several favoring porencephaly, based on, what will later emerge, a misinterpretation of the Pneumoencephalograms.

Since the results of surgical treatment of intracerebral hemorrhagic cysts are often very satisfactory, it seems clear that an alertness to the need of distinguishing it from porencephaly, which is refractory to operative intervention, should be stated. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

PHILADELPHIA; COLOMBO, CEYLON


Footnotes

Received for publication Nov. 18, 1960.

Graduate Hospital, University of Pennsylvania and Doctors Hospital, Philadelphia (Case Report).

University of Pennsylvania Graduate School of Medicine, Philadelphia (Dr. Moore and Dr. Ratnavale).

Presented before the combined meeting of the Philadelphia Neurological Society and the Section of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry of the District of Columbia, Philadelphia, Nov. 4, 1960.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.