You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 4 No. 3, March 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (39)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Studies on Headache

The Mode of Action of UML-491 and Its Relevance to the Nature of Vascular Headache of the Migraine Type

DONALD J. DALESSIO; WALTER A. CAMP; HAROLD G. WOLFF

Arch Neurol. 1961;4(3):235-240.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

UML-491,* 1-methyl-D-lysergic acid butanolamide bimaleate, a derivative of lysergic acid, is being extensively investigated as regards its apparent although limited effectiveness in prevention of vascular headache.1,2,3 It is known to have an antiserotonin and an antiedema action in laboratory animals.4,5,6 It is also known not to have a direct or immediate vasoconstrictor action.8,9 To establish whether or not such antiedema effects of this agent are specific for serotonin, and whether the agent also possesses a nonspecific anti-inflammatory effect in man, a series of observations using manganese butyrate as a noxious agent to induce sterile inflammation were undertaken. Furthermore, observations concerning its central action and its indirect effect on peripheral vascular structures were noted.

Anti Inflammatory Action of UML-491 in Man

The method of Lovell, Goodman, Hudson, Armitage, and Pickering7 was applied in order to define whether or not UML-491 has an anti-inflammatory action in human subjects . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

HELEN GOODELL; NEW YORK

From the New York Hospital and the Department of Medicine (Neurology), Cornell University Medical College.


Footnotes

Received for publication Dec. 1, 1960.

Supported in part by the National Instituteof Health, Bethesda, Md., and in part by the Society for the Investigation of Human Ecology.

The UML-491 was supplied by courtesy of Sandoz Pharmaceuticals, Division of Sandoz, Inc. Hanover, N. J.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.