You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 4 No. 1, January 1961 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (108)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Stimulation of Caudate Nucleus

Behavioral Effects of Chemical and Electrical Excitation

JANICE R. STEVENS, M.D.; CHUL KIM, M.D.; PAUL D. MacLEAN, M.D.

Arch Neurol. 1961;4(1):47-54.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Studies employing electrical stimulation in chronically prepared, freely moving animals have given disappointingly little information about the functions of the caudate nucleus. In those instances in which positive motor responses have been reported,1,2,7 there is still the problem of refuting or confirming Kinnier Wilson's arguments that the effects are owing to excitation of fibers of passage.19

In investigations of the limbic system, we have employed local chemical stimulation of the brain as an adjunct to electrical stimulation.13 We have favored the use of acetylcholine or related drugs because acetylcholine is a naturally occurring substance in the brain and may function in the central nervous system as a neural transmitter. The use of cholinergic stimulation for exploration of the functions of the caudate seemed particularly appropriate for several reasons. 1. Such stimulation ostensibly does not excite nerve fibers and would therefore not activate fibers of passage. 2. Similarly, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

PORTLAND, ORE.; SEOUL, KOREA; BETHESDA, MD.


Footnotes

Accepted for publication Sept. 16, 1960.

This work was conducted in the Laboratory of Physiology, Yale University School of Medicine, during the years 1953-1956, and was supported by grants from Foundations' Fund for Research in Psychiatry and the National Institute of Neurological Diseases and Blindness of the National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health Service.

Assistant Professor of Neurology, University of Oregon Medical School (Dr. Stevens). Professor of Physiology, College of Medicine, Seoul National University; American-Korean Foundation Fellow at time of collaboration in present study (1954-1956) (Dr. Kim). Chief of Section on Limbic Integration and Behavior, Laboratory of Neurophysiology, National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, Md. (Dr. MacLean).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1961 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.