You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 39 No. 7, July 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Coronaviruses and Multiple Sclerosis

John O. Fleming, MD; Stephen A. Stohlman, PhD; Leslie P. Weiner, MD
USC School of Medicine McKibben Annex, Room 142 2025 Zonal Ave Los Angeles, CA 90033

Arch Neurol. 1982;39(7):455.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Madden et al (ARCHIVES 1981;38:209-210) presented an interesting and careful study of antibodies to coronaviruses in the sera of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and controls. However, for a number of reasons we do not agree that their data, based entirely on a serologic survey, warrants the conclusion that "coronaviruses do not appear to be associated with the cause of MS."

First, as the authors pointed out, coronaviruses are ubiquitous in man. This fact accounts for the high incidence of seropositivity in controls and may make it difficult to identify patients with disease, ie, nervous system involvement, against the background of general seropositivity. This is the case, for example, with conditions such as progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy1 in which both affected patient and control populations have a high percentage of persons with antibody to the relevant virus, thus making diagnosis on serologic grounds impossible.

Second, analysis of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.