You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 39 No. 3, March 1982 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Atypical Contrast Enhancement in Computed Tomography of Demyelinating Disease

John F. Aita, MD
105 S 49th St Omaha, NE 68132

Arch Neurol. 1982;39(3):194-195.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

The article "Atypical Contrast Enhancement in Computerized Tomography of Demyelinating Disease" by Dr Marano and colleagues in the ARCHIVES (1980;37:523-524) dealing with cranial computed tomography (CT) and multiple sclerosis (MS) raises several issues and questions that deserve further comment.

Results of cranial CT-histologic correlation studies have confirmed that there are two types of low-density MS lesions on CT scans: (1) areas of active demyelination1-3 and (2) areas of sclerosis (R. A. Clasen, MD, written communication, May 1979).4 It is conceivable that biopsy specimens of these areas, adjacent to the region of contrast enhancement, may have been obtained in the case reported by Dr Marano and associates.

Cranial CT contrast-enhanced MS lesions represent areas of histologically active demyelination5.6 and may result from a loosening of the blood-brain barrier, with resultant extravasation of the iodinated contrast material into the surrounding parenchyma.7 Previously, it was thought that . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1982 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.