You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 38 No. 12, December 1981 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

The Doctrine of the Nerves

by J. D. Spillane, 467 pp, with illus, $50, New York, Oxford University Press, 1981.

Bruce H. Peters, MD, Reviewer
Department of Neurology University of Texas Medical Branch Galveston, TX 77550

Arch Neurol. 1981;38(12):787-788.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This book is primarily intended to show the newcomer to neurology "where we neurologists came from." Dr Spillane believes in the educational value of the history of medicine and in these 467 pages he selects many of modern neurology's ancestors and chronicles the interactions of their thoughts. Spillane's scholarship and his respect for his profession's forebears shine brightly here. From Galen to Gowers (but with little attention to others such as Jackson and Charcot) he provides quotations and wry, commonsense editorial comments.

The writing is comfortably breezy (reminiscent of Spillane's An Atlas of Clinical Neurology) but not superficial, and the reader will find work as well as reward here. The important writings of Robert Whytt and John Cooke, which will be unfamiliar to many American readers, are detailed. The founders of American neurology, W. A. Hammond and S. W. Mitchell, are nicely described. An extensive bibliography makes the book a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1981 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.