You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 37 No. 6, June 1980 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Second Lumbar Puncture in Aseptic Meningitis

C. Richard Magnussen, MD
Department of Medicine St Mary's Hospital 89 Genesee St Rochester, NY 14611

Arch Neurol. 1980;37(6):398-399.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

Differentiation of bacterial from aseptic meningitis must be made promptly and accurately. The CSF WBC differential in aseptic meningitis often exhibits a polymorphonuclear leukocyte predominance early in the course of the infection.1 The article by Varki and Puthuran (ARCHIVES 36:581-582, 1979) corroborates this phenomenon in ten adults with aseptic meningitis, all of whom demonstrated a "significant fall" in the percent of polymorphonuclear leukocytes 18 to 48 hours after the initial lumbar puncture (LP). The authors are to be complimented for what is, to our knowledge, the first prospective analysis of serial changes in differential WBC counts of CSF in patients with uncomplicated aseptic meningitis.

The authors reported their data in terms of "mean" values of polymorphonuclear leukocytes measured at the time of the second LP compared with that at the time of the initial LP, and commented that a second analysis performed 18 to 48 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1980 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.