You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 36 No. 9, September 1979 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Homosexuality in Perspective

by William H. Masters and Virginia E. Johnson, 450 pp, with illus, $17.50, Boston, Little Brown & Co, 1979.

George Winokur, MD, Reviewer
Department of Psychiatry University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics Iowa City, IA 52242

Arch Neurol. 1979;36(9):600.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This new report by Masters and Johnson lacks the drama that attended their rediscovery of the clitoris and their description of the sexual flush. The authors here describe their research into the physiology and psychology of homosexuality. It is not a particularly scholarly book, eg, their bibliography is not even relevant to the text, and when they note that the adrenogenital syndromes or Klinefelter's syndromes seem to be associated with a higher-than-expected incidence of homosexuality, they do not reference this.

The authors show that the sexual physiology of homosexuals is similar to that of heterosexuals. This should not surprise us in that the anatomy is similar; and, anyway, the common denominator of sexuality is friction. Homosexual dysfunction (impotence, anorgasmia, etc) is presented as having much in common with heterosexual dysfunction. This is a significant finding.

The clinical investigation leaves much to be desired in that it is not systematic. There . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1979 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.