You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 34 No. 4, April 1977 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Morphological Basis of Late Component Potentials in Duchenne Dystrophy-Reply

J. E. Desmedt, MD; S. Borenstein, MD
Brain Research Unit of the Univ of Brussels, 115 Blvd de Waterloo B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

Arch Neurol. 1977;34(4):259.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.—

The comments by Dr Coërs relate to questions that we of course considered in detail when we first found the significantly increased incidence of linked potentials associated with the myopathic motor units in muscles with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)1 (Arch Neurol 33:642, 1976). We concur in the opinion that no motor axon loss takes place in DMD, and furthermore that an unemployed axonal branch having lost its muscle fiber through the dystrophic disintegration process might very well take up a new job by innervating a newly formed muscle fiber resulting from either segmental necrosis or myotube regeneration, as we proposed. The issue whether such innervation of the newly formed muscle fibers is achieved by axonal branches that either belonged to the original motor axon arborization or represent new collateral sprouts thereof is of course pertinent, but appears indeed of secondary interest with respect to the major problem raised by . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1977 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.