This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Reply to article  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in this journal  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

F. H. Norris, Jr, MD; San Francisco
The Institutes of Medical Sciences

CA 94120

Arch Neurol. 1977;34(2):133.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.—

The report by Medina et al (Arch Neurol 33:587, 1976) of myokymia resulting from peripheral nerve injury merits further comment. I have never been confident of a qualitative distinction between fasciculation and myokymia. If one acknowledges that they possess some essential characteristics in common, and thus might represent different parts of a spectrum of involuntary motor unit activity, then a better example to indicate a peripheral origin of such motor unit activity is the case reported by Harvey and Kuffler¹ in which fasciculation activity occurred after completenerve transection was verified surgically.

The case described by Medina and co-workers contains an unknown factor: the integrity of the spinal cord. Why should myokymia have occurred in that patient when in thousands of comparable nerve injuries there is no such motor unit activity? Perhaps their patient had unusual irritation of sensory fibers, which caused discharge of spinal motor neurons . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?