 |
 |

Severely Brain Damaged
W. J. Gardner, MD
Cleveland Clinic 9500 Euclid Ave Cleveland, OH 44106
F. H. Norris, Jr, MD
The Institutes of Medical Sciences San Francisco, CA 94120
Arch Neurol. 1977;34(2):133.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor.—
Professor Jennett's editorial, "Resource Allocation for the Severely Brain Damaged" (Arch Neurol 33:595, 1976), is very timely. I would like only to make one point. I have found it helpful in dealing with this problem, for instance in the case of a wife, to tell the husband, "Your wife is dead. This is only her body. It can be kept alive indefinitely by artificial means, but I am sure this is not what she would have wanted."
To the Editor.—
The report by Medina et al (Arch Neurol 33:587, 1976) of myokymia resulting from peripheral nerve injury merits further comment. I have never been confident of a qualitative distinction between fasciculation and myokymia. If one acknowledges that they possess some essential characteristics in common, and thus might represent different parts of a spectrum of involuntary motor unit activity, then a better example to indicate a peripheral origin
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|