You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 3 No. 4, October 1960 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Postvaccinial Perivenous Encephalitis.

By Ernest DeVries. Price, not given. Elsevier Press, Inc., 110 Spuistraat, Amsterdam C (2330 Holcombe Blvd., Houston 25, Texas), 1960.

Bernard J. Alpers, M.D., Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1960;3(4):474.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This little monograph constitutes a good survey of the problem of postvaccinial encephalitis, based on autopsied cases of the disease occurring in the Netherlands since 1925 and on a survey of the pertinent literature. It is the author's contention that the encephalitis following vaccination is a special microglial encephalitis, but that this is not seen exclusively following vaccination. It is also seen after measles, and rarely following rubella and varicella. Associated with microglial encephalitis is a special clinical picture. The condition was rarely seen before 1923 and is never found in children under 2 years of age. The disease sometimes follows revaccination. The specific type of microglial encephalitis with its characteristic clinical features must be separated from other forms of postvaccinial encephalitis. These may simulate true postvaccinial encephalitis, but are associated with other pathological features.

The monograph reflects the study of rich material. It is a good survey of the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1960 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.