You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 29 No. 4, October 1973 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Pediatric Neurology Handbook.

Edited by JT Jabour, Danilo A Duenas, Richard C Gilmartin, Jr., Marvin I Gottlieb. Price, $10. Pp 478. Medical Examination Publishing Co, Inc, 65-36 Fresh Meadow Lane, Flushing, NY 11365, 1973.

Hart deC. Peterson, MD, Reviewer
New York

Arch Neurol. 1973;29(4):286.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In their preface, Dr. Jabour and his colleagues indicate their intent to produce a compact guidebook to pediatric neurology rather than a comprehensive text. Unfortunately, although its height and width are less than the standard text, its thickness is of the same order, and to regard it as a pocket-size would be to the exclusion of all other objects in the pocket.

The editors have made a major effort to simplify pediatric neurology. Simple, space-consuming charts, providing capsular outlines of various clinical entities are provided throughout. These capsule summaries are altogether too brief, especially as no reference material is provided at any place in this handbook. Photographs are generously used but the quality is extremely variable and, although a few are excellent, others are either unnecessary or of such poor quality that they should not have been included.

An understanding of the concept of centrencephalic epilepsy is assumed, rather than . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1973 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.