You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 28 No. 6, June 1973 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Sleep Research—A Critical Review.

By Frank R. Freemon, MD. Price, not given. Pp 205. Charles C Thomas Publisher, Springfield, Ill, 1972.

Donald J. Reis, MD, Reviewer
New York

Arch Neurol. 1973;28(6):420.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

This modest volume is an essay that presents a reasonably balanced overview of the phenomenology of sleep. Its various sections deal with descriptions of normal human sleep and the accompanying mental activity, the sleep of animals including a rather extensive and probably excessive description of the sleep of chimpanzees, the effect of sleep deprivation on human and subhuman species, the pharmacologic aspects of sleep, a survey of some aspects of sleep pathology, and finally, a discussion on theories of sleep comprising, in the main, an exposition of those held by the author. The treatment of the neurophysiological and anatomical aspects of sleep receive less space than descriptive aspects of the electroencephalogram. This, however, probably reflects the realities of the state of present knowledge. The author's treatment of these various topics is acceptably but not incisively critical. Cogent and concise summaries are lacking. The bibliography is extensive and up-to-date. In general, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1973 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.