You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 25 No. 3, September 1971 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Die Rehabilitation der Aphasie in den Romanischen Landern Nebst Beitragen zur Aphasieforschung.

By Professor Anton Leischner. Price, $6.50. Pp 104. Georg Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart, Germany, 1970.

Otto Appenzeller, MD, PhD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1971;25(3):285.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The capacity of the nervous system for clinical recovery after an ictus is widely used by those concerned with rehabilitation. Spectacular successes are often attributed to rehabilitation when, in fact, the restoration of function occurred naturally and perhaps in spite of the efforts of stroke and other rehabilitation teams.

Restoration of language function is a difficult process and most neurologists are ignorant of the methods used, and results achieved, in this difficult area. The present volume reports the proceedings of the Second Symposium on Language and Rehabilitation of Aphasics.

In comparison with work in Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, and Switzerland, our own efforts in this field are miserly. In Europe, separate clinics are available to patients, staffed by neurologists with special competence in aphasiology, neuropsychologists, and orthophonists. Attempts are made to quantify deficits and soberly assess results of treatment. The distinction is clearly made between the natural history of aphasia . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1971 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.