You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT ARCHIVES
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 24 No. 4, April 1971 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  REGULAR DEPARTMENTS
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 • Reply to article
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Kybernetics of Mind and Brain.

By D Stanley-Jones, MB, BS, FRCS. Price $10.75. Pp 174. Charles C Thomas Publisher, 301-327 E Lawrence Ave, Springfield, Ill 62703, 1970.

M. H. Charlton, MD, Reviewer

Arch Neurol. 1971;24(4):380.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Now that the gene lies prostrate, it seems that the new frontier of biological science will be the explanation of the workings of the central nervous system. Most scientists and clinicians believe that this will be achieved by the painstaking correlation of individual discoveries, such as the function of the various neurotransmitters or different neuroanatomic structures. Others hope that the truth will shine upon us by the enunciation of some large unitary concept, later to be verified by humble academic experimenters.

Dr. Stanley-Jones is clearly of the second school of thought, and places his faith in kybernetics. It may well be that Wiener's explanation of cerebellar dysfunction in terms of feedback was provocatively useful; but one need not therefore seek in such a concept the explanation of all human ills (whether neurological, psychological, or even political).

The history of science would appear to show that where large and revolutionary concepts, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1971 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.